麻辣考研 考研资料 Attached with monogamy? Avoidance predicts willingness to activate ( not real engagement) in consensual non-monogamy

Attached with monogamy? Avoidance predicts willingness to activate ( not real engagement) in consensual non-monogamy

Attached with monogamy? Avoidance predicts willingness to activate ( not real engagement) in consensual non-monogamy

Outcomes and conversation

Avoidance correlated favorably with attitudes toward CNM and willingness to take part in CNM; furthermore, males reported greater degrees of avoidance, more positive attitudes toward CNM, and greater willingness to take part in CNM than females (see dining dining Table 1). Building on accessory theory and previous research, we expected that anxiety could be adversely pertaining to attitudes toward CNM and willingness to take part in CNM, and therefore avoidance could be definitely linked to both results. To try these predictions, we carried out two hierarchical numerous regression analyses. Attitudes toward CNM and willingness to take part in CNM had been the reliant factors. Anxiousness and avoidance had been focused just before analyses; sex had been coded as 0 = feminine and 1 = male. Initially, we included relationship that is current (i.e., solitary or currently in a monogamous relationship) as a predictor both in hierarchical numerous regression analyses because individuals may feel differently toward CNM when involved in a monogamous relationship ( ag e.g., feel commitment toward their partner and so might not be inclined to endorse CNM). But, present relationship status wasn’t a substantial predictor of CNM attitudes or willingness, including in conversation because of the other separate factors (sex, anxiety, and avoidance), all ps > .25. Thus, present relationship status had not been contained in subsequent analyses.

Dining Table 1. research 1: Correlations, means, and standard deviations among people who have not involved with CNM.

Dining Dining Dining Table 1. research 1: Correlations, means, and deviations that are standard people who haven’t involved in CNM.

In the 1st action associated with regression that is hierarchical sex, anxiety, and avoidance accounted for 11percent associated with variance in attitudes toward CNM, and none regarding the conversation terms had been significant (all ps > .13); hence, the two-way interactions are not within the analysis that is final. In keeping with our hypotheses, avoidance predicted attitudes that are positive CNM and anxiety predicted negative attitudes toward CNM (see Table 2). Furthermore, males held more attitudes that are positive CNM than ladies.

Table 2. Study 1: numerous regression analyses of attitudes toward CNM and willingness to take part in CNM predicted by sex, avoidance, and anxiety.

Table 2. Study 1: numerous regression analyses of attitudes toward CNM and willingness to take part in CNM predicted by gender, avoidance, and anxiety.

A pattern that is similar for willingness to take part in CNM (see Table 2). The first-order results taken into account 13percent of this variance in willingness to take part in CNM and none for the relationship terms were significant (all ps > .09) in the 1st step; therefore, these terms weren’t within the analysis that is final. In line with our hypotheses, avoidance predicted more willingness to take part in CNM; but, anxiety had not been somewhat connected with willingness to take part in CNM. Guys had been also more prepared to participate in CNM when compared with females.

In amount, avoidance ended up being robustly related to good attitudes toward and want to take part in CNM among people who had never ever involved in CNM: people greater in avoidance endorsed more attitudes that are positive options to monogamy and had been more prepared to hypothetically take part in these kind of relationships. Possibly avoidant people see CNM relationships positively and are also more prepared to take part in them mainly because relationships promote distance from their partners and help their accepting attitudes toward uncommitted and sex that is casualFeeney & Noller; Gentzler & Kerns) https://www.datingreviewer.net/middle-eastern-dating-sites. Accessory anxiety ended up being regarding more negative attitudes toward CNM although not aspire to engage within these kinds of relationships, possibly showing anxious people’ generally speaking approach that is ambivalent closeness and closeness (Allen & Baucom).

Learn 2

Learn 1 dedicated to associations between accessory orientations and recommendation of CNM among people who had never ever involved with CNM. But, accessory orientations may vary for real engagement in CNM. To completely know the way attachment pertains to CNM, learn 2 analyzed whether accessory orientations predicted the probability of real engagement in CNM versus monogamous relationships. Therefore, we expanded from the component that is third of: behavior (cf. Penke & Asendorpf). Considering that people in CNM relationships report a few good relationship characteristics that resemble accessory safety ( e.g., Jenks; Ritchie & Barker), we expected that folks reduced in avoidance and anxiety is almost certainly going to presently maintain a CNM relationship in comparison to a relationship that is monogamous.

小兮学姐 第1张



本站考研资料说明

一、资料形式

1、本套资料为电子资料,可在PC、手机、平板等多设备端随时查阅学习;
2、购买后,均可获赠与电子版对应的全套纸质打印版资料。

二、电子资料说明

1、电子资料非实物,成功购买后,不支持退货;
2、电子资料会在专属网站、APP、微信小程序等平台同步更新,用户可以在任意平台随时查阅学习;
3、电子资料支持PC(WIN10、WIN8、WIN7)、手机、平板等多终端同步使用。PC端在线版在专属网站登录即可使用,PC端下载版限绑定一台电脑,手机及平板等移动端设备,在下载安装专属APP后并登录即可使用(同一个账号同一时间只参登录一台移动设备)。

三、打印赠品资料说明

1、打印版资料为电子资料配套赠品,仅无尝赠与给已付费用户,恕不单独出售,任何人亦不得捣卖;
2、由于排版差异,打印版实际排版可能与电子版资料略为不同,请以实物为准;
3、打印版资料内容无法做到和电子资料一样实时更新,可能会存在过时等问题,最新考研资料内容以电子资料为准;
4、打印版资料仅寄送一次,默认快递为中通或韵达,除春节等节假日及特殊情况外,正常发货时间为3天左右。如果希望指定其他快递,或者有其他特殊情况,可联系小兮学姐[ Wechat ID:ylxs03 ]处理。

四、售后服务

有任何问题,可联系小兮学姐[ Wechat ID:ylxs03 ]

小兮学姐客服 第2张

本文为麻辣考研原创,未经许可,不得转载!http://www.malakaoyan.com/2374/
头像

作者: a002

麻辣考研专注收集考研所需要的内部模拟真题库答案、考点笔记、视频、辅导班讲义等培训资料和教材参考书课件,在线提供考研公共课、专业课程网课、预测题、英语作文模板听力及数学公式,更多一对一研究生考试复习及复试资料可以加入内部考研群
联系我们

联系我们

关注微信
微信扫一扫关注我们

微信扫一扫关注我们

返回顶部